Skip to content

5 Investments Positioned to Win From Trump's Spending Push

M
Marcus Webb
June 3, 2026
10 min read
Business & Money
5 Investments Positioned to Win From Trump's Spending Push - Image from the article

Quick Summary

Trump's AI push, defense spending, and supply chain reshoring are moving hundreds of billions. Here are 5 investment areas—and specific ETFs—worth watching now.

In This Article

The Money Is Already Moving — Are You Positioned?

When governments redirect hundreds of billions of dollars, they don't send you a calendar invite. The shift happens quietly, through contracts, executive orders, and budget allocations. By the time it hits the headlines, the early investors have already taken their positions. The Trump administration's current spending priorities — artificial intelligence infrastructure, rare earth metals, defense, water, and power grid modernisation — represent one of the most significant reshufflings of capital in recent memory. Whether you agree with the politics or not is beside the point. The point is that money flows create investment opportunities, and right now, several of those flows are large, fast, and identifiable.

This article breaks down five investment themes driven by current U.S. policy and global macro shifts, explains the underlying logic behind each, and points to specific ETF vehicles that give you exposure without the risk of picking individual stocks.


1. Rare Earth Metals: The Supply Chain Nobody Talked About Until It Broke

For decades, the United States quietly outsourced the mining and processing of rare earth elements to China. These aren't obscure materials — they're embedded in smartphones, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and precision-guided military weapons. When the Trump administration escalated tariffs on Chinese goods in 2025, China responded by restricting rare earth exports. Suddenly, a supply chain vulnerability that analysts had flagged for years became a national security crisis.

The U.S. government's response was direct: invest federal dollars into domestic and allied-nation mining operations. This isn't speculation — it's policy, backed by defence department contracts and strategic reserve funding.

Why this matters for investors: Government backing de-risks early-stage mining companies to a degree that private capital alone rarely achieves. When Washington calls something a matter of national security, funding tends to follow consistently and at scale.

ETFs to research:

  • REMX — VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF. Focused on miners outside China, directly aligned with U.S. reshoring goals.
  • COPX — Global X Copper Miners ETF. Copper is essential for EV batteries, power infrastructure, and data centres — all sectors expanding rapidly.
  • SLX — VanEck Steel ETF. As U.S. manufacturing reshores, domestic steel demand rises with it.

Key takeaway: The rare earth play is not just about mining — it's about the entire materials supply chain being rebuilt from scratch. That takes years and creates sustained investment demand, not a short-term spike.


2. The AI Investment Opportunity Has Five Distinct Layers

Most investors hear "invest in AI" and immediately think of Nvidia or OpenAI. That's surface-level thinking. Artificial intelligence is better understood as an ecosystem — a stack of interdependent industries, each with its own investment profile and risk curve. The Trump administration's multi-hundred-billion-dollar Stargate initiative is injecting capital across multiple layers of this stack simultaneously.

Here's how to think about AI as an investment onion:

Layer 1 — Semiconductors (The Brain)

No chips, no AI. The U.S. government has made domestic chip production a strategic priority, backing companies like Intel with direct investment. ETFs like SMH (VanEck Semiconductor) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor) give broad exposure to this space. Demand for chips is structural — AI adoption is accelerating regardless of short-term market cycles.

Layer 2 — Power & Nuclear Energy (The Fuel)

Running a large language model costs roughly 10 times more energy per query than a standard Google search. At scale — billions of queries daily — that adds up to an enormous power requirement that the current U.S. grid cannot reliably supply. Nuclear energy has re-emerged as the preferred solution, with tech giants like Microsoft and Google signing long-term nuclear power purchase agreements.

ETFs to consider: NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear), URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners), URA (Global X Uranium). Each offers slightly different exposure across the uranium mining and nuclear utility spectrum.

Layer 3 — Grid Infrastructure (The Wiring)

Even nuclear power needs a modern grid to distribute it. The U.S. electrical infrastructure hasn't had a major overhaul in decades. Now it urgently needs one. GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid) and PAVE (Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development) are two ETFs that capture the infrastructure build-out thesis.

5 Investments Positioned to Win From Trump's Spending Push

Layer 4 — Cybersecurity (The Lock)

More AI means more data, more attack surfaces, and more sophisticated threats. As businesses and governments push sensitive operations through AI platforms, cybersecurity becomes mission-critical — and a growth industry. CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity) offer diversified exposure to this layer.

Layer 5 — Data Centres (The Real Estate)

The cloud is not abstract — it's a physical building consuming power and real estate. Data centre REITs and operators are among the most direct beneficiaries of AI growth, combining real estate stability with technology upside. SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure) and VPN (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure) are purpose-built ETFs for this niche.

Key takeaway: Don't just buy "AI stocks." Map the value chain and decide which layer fits your risk tolerance and time horizon. Each layer has different volatility profiles and growth drivers.


3. Water Infrastructure: The Overlooked Resource Powering the AI Economy

Researchers at UC Riverside estimated that a short conversation with ChatGPT consumes roughly one litre of water. That sounds trivial — until you multiply it by hundreds of millions of daily AI interactions across every platform, every business, every country. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon collectively consume billions of gallons of water annually to cool their data centres. That consumption is accelerating as AI usage grows.

The problem isn't water scarcity in the absolute sense. It's infrastructure capacity. Treatment plants, distribution networks, and purification systems were built for population-level consumption curves that didn't account for hyperscale data centres appearing in communities across the country. The gap between water consumption growth and water infrastructure investment is widening — and that gap is an investment opportunity.

ETFs to research:

  • PHO — Invesco Water Resources ETF. Focused on U.S. companies in water infrastructure and treatment.
  • FLW — First Trust Water ETF. Broader global exposure with a tilt toward water technology companies.
  • CGW — Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF. International diversification across water utilities and infrastructure.

Key takeaway: Water is not a glamorous investment story, which is exactly why it tends to be under-owned and mispriced. The fundamentals — rising demand, ageing infrastructure, no alternative resource — are straightforward and durable.


4. Defence Spending: Record Budgets, Private Contractors, Public Markets

U.S. defence spending hit record levels in 2025 and shows no sign of reversing. Geopolitical tensions — from the South China Sea to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East — are pushing not just the U.S. but NATO allies to dramatically increase military budgets. NATO's 2% GDP spending target, which many members ignored for years, is now being treated as a floor, not a ceiling.

The critical structural point: modern militaries do not manufacture their own equipment. They contract it out. That means every dollar of increased defence budget flows directly to publicly traded private companies — defence contractors, aerospace manufacturers, technology integrators, and cybersecurity firms with military contracts.

For investors, ETFs like ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense) or XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense) provide broad exposure to this contractor ecosystem. DFEN offers a leveraged play for those with higher risk tolerance, though leverage cuts both ways.

Key takeaway: Defence spending is one of the most counter-cyclical investment themes available. It tends to increase during economic uncertainty and geopolitical instability — precisely the conditions defining the current environment.


Free Weekly Newsletter

Enjoying this guide?

Get the best articles like this one delivered to your inbox every week. No spam.

5 Investments Positioned to Win From Trump's Spending Push

5. Thinking Like an Investor, Not a Spectator

The five themes above — rare earth metals, the AI stack, water infrastructure, and defence — share a common characteristic: they are all driven by structural, policy-backed demand rather than consumer sentiment or product cycles. That makes them more durable than trend-chasing investments and less dependent on any single company's quarterly earnings.

Here's the disciplined investor's framework for evaluating these opportunities:

  1. Identify the money flow first. Where is government or institutional capital being deployed at scale? Follow the contracts, not the headlines.
  2. Choose breadth over concentration. ETFs reduce the risk of picking the wrong company within a winning sector. You don't need to know which copper miner wins — you just need to know copper mining will grow.
  3. Think in time horizons. Rare earth mining takes years to scale. Nuclear plant approvals take a decade. Don't apply a 90-day trading mindset to a 10-year infrastructure build.
  4. Separate the narrative from the numbers. AI is genuinely transformative, but that doesn't mean every AI-adjacent stock is fairly valued. Focus on the infrastructure layer — chips, power, data centres — where demand is measurable and contractual.
  5. Size positions appropriately. Emerging sectors come with volatility. A 3–5% portfolio allocation to a theme like uranium or rare earths provides meaningful upside exposure without catastrophic downside if timing is off.

Key takeaway: The investors who benefit most from major policy shifts are not the ones who react fastest — they're the ones who understand the underlying mechanics and size positions with discipline.


Practical Next Steps

None of the ETFs mentioned in this article constitute investment advice. They are starting points for research. Before allocating capital to any of these themes, run your own due diligence: check expense ratios, holdings concentration, liquidity, and how each fund performed during previous market downturns.

What you can do today:

  • Open a watchlist with the ETFs mentioned across each theme
  • Research the top 5 holdings in each ETF to understand your actual exposure
  • Set a position sizing rule before you invest — know your maximum allocation per theme
  • Track policy announcements quarterly — government spending priorities shift, and your thesis should update accordingly

The money is moving. The question is whether you're building a framework to move with it thoughtfully, or waiting for the news cycle to tell you the trade is over.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Are these investments suitable for a beginner investor? Many of the ETFs discussed — such as those covering semiconductors, infrastructure, or defence — are straightforward to purchase through standard brokerage accounts and are appropriate for investors at various experience levels. However, some sectors like uranium mining or rare earth metals are more volatile and may be better suited to experienced investors who understand commodity cycles. Always assess your risk tolerance and time horizon before investing.

Q: Why use ETFs instead of individual stocks for these themes? ETFs spread your risk across multiple companies within a sector, which is especially valuable in emerging or policy-driven industries where individual company outcomes are hard to predict. For example, you may be right that rare earth mining will grow in the U.S. — but wrong about which specific miner succeeds. An ETF captures the sector return without requiring you to pick the winner.

Q: How much of a portfolio should be allocated to thematic investments like these? Most financial planning frameworks suggest keeping thematic or sector-specific investments to 10–20% of a total portfolio, with the remainder in diversified index funds. Within that thematic allocation, further diversification across multiple themes — rather than concentrating in one — reduces volatility. The exact percentages depend on your age, income stability, and investment timeline.

Q: What is the biggest risk to these investment themes? Policy reversal is the primary risk. Many of these opportunities are driven by government spending and regulatory priorities, which can shift with administrations or budget negotiations. Trade deals with China could reduce the urgency of rare earth reshoring, for example. Additionally, if AI adoption plateaus or a major tech company scales back data centre investment, the power and water infrastructure thesis weakens. Investors should monitor policy signals and corporate capex announcements as leading indicators.

Frequently Asked Questions

The Money Is Already Moving — Are You Positioned?

When governments redirect hundreds of billions of dollars, they don't send you a calendar invite. The shift happens quietly, through contracts, executive orders, and budget allocations. By the time it hits the headlines, the early investors have already taken their positions. The Trump administration's current spending priorities — artificial intelligence infrastructure, rare earth metals, defense, water, and power grid modernisation — represent one of the most significant reshufflings of capital in recent memory. Whether you agree with the politics or not is beside the point. The point is that money flows create investment opportunities, and right now, several of those flows are large, fast, and identifiable.

This article breaks down five investment themes driven by current U.S. policy and global macro shifts, explains the underlying logic behind each, and points to specific ETF vehicles that give you exposure without the risk of picking individual stocks.


  1. Rare Earth Metals: The Supply Chain Nobody Talked About Until It Broke

For decades, the United States quietly outsourced the mining and processing of rare earth elements to China. These aren't obscure materials — they're embedded in smartphones, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and precision-guided military weapons. When the Trump administration escalated tariffs on Chinese goods in 2025, China responded by restricting rare earth exports. Suddenly, a supply chain vulnerability that analysts had flagged for years became a national security crisis.

The U.S. government's response was direct: invest federal dollars into domestic and allied-nation mining operations. This isn't speculation — it's policy, backed by defence department contracts and strategic reserve funding.

Why this matters for investors: Government backing de-risks early-stage mining companies to a degree that private capital alone rarely achieves. When Washington calls something a matter of national security, funding tends to follow consistently and at scale.

ETFs to research:

  • REMX — VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF. Focused on miners outside China, directly aligned with U.S. reshoring goals.
  • COPX — Global X Copper Miners ETF. Copper is essential for EV batteries, power infrastructure, and data centres — all sectors expanding rapidly.
  • SLX — VanEck Steel ETF. As U.S. manufacturing reshores, domestic steel demand rises with it.

Key takeaway: The rare earth play is not just about mining — it's about the entire materials supply chain being rebuilt from scratch. That takes years and creates sustained investment demand, not a short-term spike.


  1. The AI Investment Opportunity Has Five Distinct Layers

Most investors hear "invest in AI" and immediately think of Nvidia or OpenAI. That's surface-level thinking. Artificial intelligence is better understood as an ecosystem — a stack of interdependent industries, each with its own investment profile and risk curve. The Trump administration's multi-hundred-billion-dollar Stargate initiative is injecting capital across multiple layers of this stack simultaneously.

Here's how to think about AI as an investment onion:

Layer 1 — Semiconductors (The Brain)

No chips, no AI. The U.S. government has made domestic chip production a strategic priority, backing companies like Intel with direct investment. ETFs like SMH (VanEck Semiconductor) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor) give broad exposure to this space. Demand for chips is structural — AI adoption is accelerating regardless of short-term market cycles.

Layer 2 — Power & Nuclear Energy (The Fuel)

Running a large language model costs roughly 10 times more energy per query than a standard Google search. At scale — billions of queries daily — that adds up to an enormous power requirement that the current U.S. grid cannot reliably supply. Nuclear energy has re-emerged as the preferred solution, with tech giants like Microsoft and Google signing long-term nuclear power purchase agreements.

ETFs to consider: NLR (VanEck Uranium and Nuclear), URNM (Sprott Uranium Miners), URA (Global X Uranium). Each offers slightly different exposure across the uranium mining and nuclear utility spectrum.

Layer 3 — Grid Infrastructure (The Wiring)

Even nuclear power needs a modern grid to distribute it. The U.S. electrical infrastructure hasn't had a major overhaul in decades. Now it urgently needs one. GRID (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid) and PAVE (Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development) are two ETFs that capture the infrastructure build-out thesis.

Layer 4 — Cybersecurity (The Lock)

More AI means more data, more attack surfaces, and more sophisticated threats. As businesses and governments push sensitive operations through AI platforms, cybersecurity becomes mission-critical — and a growth industry. CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity) and HACK (Amplify Cybersecurity) offer diversified exposure to this layer.

Layer 5 — Data Centres (The Real Estate)

The cloud is not abstract — it's a physical building consuming power and real estate. Data centre REITs and operators are among the most direct beneficiaries of AI growth, combining real estate stability with technology upside. SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure) and VPN (Global X Data Center & Digital Infrastructure) are purpose-built ETFs for this niche.

Key takeaway: Don't just buy "AI stocks." Map the value chain and decide which layer fits your risk tolerance and time horizon. Each layer has different volatility profiles and growth drivers.


  1. Water Infrastructure: The Overlooked Resource Powering the AI Economy

Researchers at UC Riverside estimated that a short conversation with ChatGPT consumes roughly one litre of water. That sounds trivial — until you multiply it by hundreds of millions of daily AI interactions across every platform, every business, every country. Microsoft, Google, and Amazon collectively consume billions of gallons of water annually to cool their data centres. That consumption is accelerating as AI usage grows.

The problem isn't water scarcity in the absolute sense. It's infrastructure capacity. Treatment plants, distribution networks, and purification systems were built for population-level consumption curves that didn't account for hyperscale data centres appearing in communities across the country. The gap between water consumption growth and water infrastructure investment is widening — and that gap is an investment opportunity.

ETFs to research:

  • PHO — Invesco Water Resources ETF. Focused on U.S. companies in water infrastructure and treatment.
  • FLW — First Trust Water ETF. Broader global exposure with a tilt toward water technology companies.
  • CGW — Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF. International diversification across water utilities and infrastructure.

Key takeaway: Water is not a glamorous investment story, which is exactly why it tends to be under-owned and mispriced. The fundamentals — rising demand, ageing infrastructure, no alternative resource — are straightforward and durable.


  1. Defence Spending: Record Budgets, Private Contractors, Public Markets

U.S. defence spending hit record levels in 2025 and shows no sign of reversing. Geopolitical tensions — from the South China Sea to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East — are pushing not just the U.S. but NATO allies to dramatically increase military budgets. NATO's 2% GDP spending target, which many members ignored for years, is now being treated as a floor, not a ceiling.

The critical structural point: modern militaries do not manufacture their own equipment. They contract it out. That means every dollar of increased defence budget flows directly to publicly traded private companies — defence contractors, aerospace manufacturers, technology integrators, and cybersecurity firms with military contracts.

For investors, ETFs like ITA (iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense) or XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense) provide broad exposure to this contractor ecosystem. DFEN offers a leveraged play for those with higher risk tolerance, though leverage cuts both ways.

Key takeaway: Defence spending is one of the most counter-cyclical investment themes available. It tends to increase during economic uncertainty and geopolitical instability — precisely the conditions defining the current environment.


  1. Thinking Like an Investor, Not a Spectator

The five themes above — rare earth metals, the AI stack, water infrastructure, and defence — share a common characteristic: they are all driven by structural, policy-backed demand rather than consumer sentiment or product cycles. That makes them more durable than trend-chasing investments and less dependent on any single company's quarterly earnings.

Here's the disciplined investor's framework for evaluating these opportunities:

  1. Identify the money flow first. Where is government or institutional capital being deployed at scale? Follow the contracts, not the headlines.
  2. Choose breadth over concentration. ETFs reduce the risk of picking the wrong company within a winning sector. You don't need to know which copper miner wins — you just need to know copper mining will grow.
  3. Think in time horizons. Rare earth mining takes years to scale. Nuclear plant approvals take a decade. Don't apply a 90-day trading mindset to a 10-year infrastructure build.
  4. Separate the narrative from the numbers. AI is genuinely transformative, but that doesn't mean every AI-adjacent stock is fairly valued. Focus on the infrastructure layer — chips, power, data centres — where demand is measurable and contractual.
  5. Size positions appropriately. Emerging sectors come with volatility. A 3–5% portfolio allocation to a theme like uranium or rare earths provides meaningful upside exposure without catastrophic downside if timing is off.

Key takeaway: The investors who benefit most from major policy shifts are not the ones who react fastest — they're the ones who understand the underlying mechanics and size positions with discipline.


Practical Next Steps

None of the ETFs mentioned in this article constitute investment advice. They are starting points for research. Before allocating capital to any of these themes, run your own due diligence: check expense ratios, holdings concentration, liquidity, and how each fund performed during previous market downturns.

What you can do today:

  • Open a watchlist with the ETFs mentioned across each theme
  • Research the top 5 holdings in each ETF to understand your actual exposure
  • Set a position sizing rule before you invest — know your maximum allocation per theme
  • Track policy announcements quarterly — government spending priorities shift, and your thesis should update accordingly

The money is moving. The question is whether you're building a framework to move with it thoughtfully, or waiting for the news cycle to tell you the trade is over.


Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Are these investments suitable for a beginner investor? Many of the ETFs discussed — such as those covering semiconductors, infrastructure, or defence — are straightforward to purchase through standard brokerage accounts and are appropriate for investors at various experience levels. However, some sectors like uranium mining or rare earth metals are more volatile and may be better suited to experienced investors who understand commodity cycles. Always assess your risk tolerance and time horizon before investing.

Q: Why use ETFs instead of individual stocks for these themes? ETFs spread your risk across multiple companies within a sector, which is especially valuable in emerging or policy-driven industries where individual company outcomes are hard to predict. For example, you may be right that rare earth mining will grow in the U.S. — but wrong about which specific miner succeeds. An ETF captures the sector return without requiring you to pick the winner.

Q: How much of a portfolio should be allocated to thematic investments like these? Most financial planning frameworks suggest keeping thematic or sector-specific investments to 10–20% of a total portfolio, with the remainder in diversified index funds. Within that thematic allocation, further diversification across multiple themes — rather than concentrating in one — reduces volatility. The exact percentages depend on your age, income stability, and investment timeline.

Q: What is the biggest risk to these investment themes? Policy reversal is the primary risk. Many of these opportunities are driven by government spending and regulatory priorities, which can shift with administrations or budget negotiations. Trade deals with China could reduce the urgency of rare earth reshoring, for example. Additionally, if AI adoption plateaus or a major tech company scales back data centre investment, the power and water infrastructure thesis weakens. Investors should monitor policy signals and corporate capex announcements as leading indicators.

Z

About Zeebrain Editorial

Our editorial team is dedicated to providing clear, well-researched, and high-utility content for the modern digital landscape. We focus on accuracy, practicality, and insights that matter.

More from Business & Money

Related Guides

Keep exploring this topic

Explore More Categories

Keep browsing by topic and build depth around the subjects you care about most.