IWM vs VB
| Metric | IWM | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $270.44 | $284.32 |
| Day Change % | -1.69% | -1.27% |
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%✓ |
| AUM | $78.04B | $175.77B✓ |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 1.28%✓ |
| 52-Week High | $305.18 | $309.51 |
| 52-Week Low | $228.90 | $241.17 |
| 50-Day Avg | $289.07 | $295.34 |
| 200-Day Avg | $277.65 | $285.23 |
| Inception Year | N/A | N/A |
| Asset Class | Equities | Equities |
| Exchange | ARCX | ARCX |
Top Holdings
IWM
BlackRock Cash Funds Treasury SL Agency
Twist Bioscience Corp
Moog Inc Class A
JFrog Ltd Ordinary Shares
10x Genomics Inc Ordinary Shares - Class A
VB
Natera Inc
Twilio Inc Class A
Revolution Medicines Inc Ordinary Shares
Illumina Inc
Everpure Inc Class A
Sector Allocation
IWM
VB
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWM or VB?
VB is cheaper: it charges 0.03% per year in expenses, versus 0.19% for IWM. The expense ratio is the annual fee a fund deducts from its assets.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWM or VB?
VB currently pays the higher dividend yield: 1.28%, versus 0.98% for IWM. Yields move with prices and payouts.
Which fund is bigger, IWM or VB?
VB is the bigger fund, with $175.77B in assets under management (the total money invested in the fund), versus $78.04B for IWM. Larger funds usually trade with tighter spreads.
Should I buy IWM or VB?
There is no single right answer for every investor. Compare the expense ratios, dividend yields, and what each fund actually holds (see the tables above). When two funds track very similar markets, the cheaper one usually wins over long holding periods. This page is information, not investment advice.
Full IWM Profile
iShares Russell 2000 ETF
Full VB Profile
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Data sourced from Financial Modeling Prep and may be delayed or incomplete. Holdings and sector weights are not available for every fund. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always verify data with the fund provider before making investment decisions.