GLD vs SLV
| Metric | GLD | SLV |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $382.01 | $51.51 |
| Day Change % | -0.18% | -0.79% |
| Expense Ratio | 0.4%✓ | 0.5% |
| AUM | $141.70B✓ | $29.96B |
| Dividend Yield | 0% | 0% |
| 52-Week High | $509.70 | $109.83 |
| 52-Week Low | $360.12 | $41.70 |
| 50-Day Avg | $397.18 | $57.76 |
| 200-Day Avg | $414.98 | $65.40 |
| Inception Year | N/A | N/A |
| Asset Class | Commodities | Commodities |
| Exchange | ARCX | ARCX |
Top Holdings
GLD
No holdings data available.
SLV
No holdings data available.
Sector Allocation
GLD
No sector data available.
SLV
No sector data available.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GLD or SLV?
GLD is cheaper: it charges 0.4% per year in expenses, versus 0.5% for SLV. The expense ratio is the annual fee a fund deducts from its assets.
Which pays a higher dividend, GLD or SLV?
Both funds currently yield about 0%.
Which fund is bigger, GLD or SLV?
GLD is the bigger fund, with $141.70B in assets under management (the total money invested in the fund), versus $29.96B for SLV. Larger funds usually trade with tighter spreads.
Should I buy GLD or SLV?
There is no single right answer for every investor. Compare the expense ratios, dividend yields, and what each fund actually holds (see the tables above). When two funds track very similar markets, the cheaper one usually wins over long holding periods. This page is information, not investment advice.
Data sourced from Financial Modeling Prep and may be delayed or incomplete. Holdings and sector weights are not available for every fund. This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Always verify data with the fund provider before making investment decisions.